ConPro Spatial is changing! For now, you may view the already existing ConPro spatial application or other spatial information
in a new browser window by clicking on one of the links below. Note that TNC users must log in to see the complete data.
- ecad.tnc.org/ConProSpatial
- Map of TNC's Conservation Projects will open in a new browser window which contains links to detailed project data in ConPro. TNC users must log in to see complete data.
- maps.tnc.org/coredata
- TNC's core conservation datasets including conservation projects dataset.
- maps.tnc.org
- Site that provides links to all of TNC's publically available data resources.
Oops. ConPro encountered an error while trying to fulfill your request. Please refresh this page
and try again.
If the error persists, please notify us using the feedback form.
Altamaha Coastal Marine (ID: 1432)
Project last modified by
aspeers
on
February 09, 2010.
-
- Download Data
- See Associated Info (10)
This conservation project has been locked by a Miradi upload. For more information about Miradi uploads/downloads, please see:
Miradi FAQs.
Miradi FAQs.
Associated Files
-
GA Coastal Protected Land Map
Size: 6.2 MB
Uploaded On: May 25, 2010 -
GA Coastal (Altamaha-Ogeechee) Business Plan
Size: 15.4 MB
Uploaded On: May 25, 2010 -
Climate Clinic Hypotheses of Change
Size: 416.1 kB
Uploaded On: October 22, 2009 -
Conceptual Graphical Model of Climate Change Impacts
Size: 292.2 kB
Uploaded On: August 25, 2009 -
Climate Change Impacts Conceptual Model
Size: 260.9 kB
Uploaded On: August 19, 2009 -
Map of Altamaha-Ogeechee Estuarine Complex
Size: 1.1 MB
Uploaded On: August 11, 2009 -
Map of Threats on Georgia's Coast
Size: 1.6 MB
Uploaded On: August 11, 2009 -
Map of Protected Land on Georgia's Coast
Size: 7.4 MB
Uploaded On: August 11, 2009 -
Hypotheses of Change (Revised Aug. 6, 2009)
Size: 24.0 kB
Uploaded On: August 11, 2009 -
Conceptual Model of Climate Change Impacts
Size: 264.5 kB
Uploaded On: August 11, 2009
Note:
To view an image, click on the
icon beside the image name.
icon beside the image name.
Associated Links
No associated links found.
- Basic
- Viability
- Threats
- Viability Assessment
- Action Plan
- Strategy Effectiveness
- Indicators
- Resources
| Name |
|---|
|
(1.1) By 2015, protect, through permanent conservation status, XX acres (or X%) of priority habitat (areas including or adjacent to conservation targets) through acquisitions, easements and planning.
|
|
(1.2) By 2010, work with regional, state and local partners to create or modify a min of 3 management plans (e.g. comp. plans, zoning ordinances, land-use regs.) to effectively minimize the impact of development on targets. (coastal dev.)
(more info)
|
|
(1.3) By 2012, work with partners to implement low impact development at a min. of 2 residential developments that are within or adjacent to priority conservation sites.
|
|
(1.4) By 2015, ensure that all shore erosion control projects consider "soft" or hybrid mitigation options and that at least 80% of new projects, in areas where alternative methods are feasible, use ecologically sensitive techniques.
(more info)
|
|
(1.5) By 2015, ensure that new marinas are located in areas that limit impact on targets, include mitigation req's focused on ecological priorities, use low impact construction and maintenance techniques and encourage public access.
|
|
(1.6) By 2012, work with regional, state and local partners to effectively minimize the impact of docks and piers on conservation targets.
|
|
(1.7) By 2015, enhance dredge permitting guidelines (large and small scale) to minimize the impacts of disposal, scouring, sediment, and pollutant activation and habitat loss.
|
|
(2.1) By 2012, implement effective management techniques to minimize (0%) loss of current intertidal oyster population.
(more info)
|
|
(2.2) By 2015, based on historic and current distributions, restore XX% of historic oyster reef habitat within the project area.
|
|
(2.3) By 2015, restore XX acres of tidal wetlands (including salt marsh, tidal fw marsh, and tidal fw forest) in the project area.
|
|
(2.4) By 2012, coordinate with the Southern Region Prescribed Fire Network to develop and implement guidelines and strategies for prescribed fire in coastal and tidal marshes and forests.
|
|
(3.1) By 2015, develop and implement management plans to reduce existing populations of three priority invasive species (e.g. Phragmites, Chinese Tallow, Water Hyancinth).
|
|
(3.2) By 2012, work to ensure that invasive species that have high potential to threaten biodiversity and impact project conservation targets are restricted or prohibited in Georgia.
(more info)
|
|
(4.1) Within the next 25 years, effectively conserve 80 percent of the sites that are expected to increase in conservation value due to sea-level rise and climate change during the next 50-100 years.
|
|
(4.2) By 2015, evaluate and implement opportunities to incorporate conservation activities (e.g. land protection, management, and restoration) as part of larger state, regional and national carbon stop loss and sequestration strategies.
|
|
(4.3) By 2012, work with X (#) of state/local communities and agencies to develop and/or revise coastal hazard response plans designed to mitigate the impact of storm events, flooding, inundation and sea level rise in relation to conservation targets.
|
|
(5.1) By 2015, ensure that water management plans (e.g. surface and groundwater withdrawals, and dams) meet needs of the conservation targets
|
|
(5.2) Ensure that the coastal waters in the project maintain water quality standards (e.g. nitrogen, dissolved oxygen) necessary to conserve the areas ecological resources.
|
|
(5.3) Ensure that the sediment regime within the Altamaha and Ogeechee watersheds is maintained in a way to support downstream conservation targets.
|
|
(5.4) Work to ensure watershed connectivity for species (e.g. diadromous fish, migratory birds) and materials (e.g. sediments).
|
|
(6.1) By 2010, promote and enforce regulations on recreational activities that minimize adverse impacts to priority species and communities (e.g. sea turtles, shorebirds) that use barrier island and beach habitat.
(more info)
|
|
(6.2) By 2015, ensure that water management plans meet the needs of estuarine targets. Water management plans include surface and groundwater withdrawal and dams.
|
|
(6.2) By 2015, minimize the impact of boating activities on conservation targets and priority species.
|
| Focal Conservation Target | Target Type | Habitat Type |
|---|---|---|
|
Tidal Freshwater Forest
(more info)
|
Ecological System | - |
|
Tidal Freshwater Marsh
(more info)
|
Ecological System | - |
|
Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh
(more info)
|
Ecological System | - |
|
Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat)
(more info)
|
- | - |
|
Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities
(more info)
|
Species Assemblage: Animals | - |
|
Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands
(more info)
|
- | - |
|
Sandy Beach Ecosystems
(more info)
|
- | - |
| Threat (Common Taxonomy) * | Targets Threatened |
|---|---|
|
Housing & Urban Development (Residential & Commercial Development :: Housing & Urban Areas ) |
|
|
Invasive Species/Predation (Invasive & Other Problematic Species & Genes :: Invasive Non-Native/Alien Species ) |
|
|
Climate Change - Habitat Shifting and Alteration (Climate Change & Severe Weather :: Habitat Shifting & Alteration ) |
|
|
Forestry Practices (Biological Resource Use :: Logging & Wood Harvesting ) |
|
|
groundwater withdrawal (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
ditches/drains (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
dredging (Transportation & Service Corridors :: Shipping Lanes ) |
|
|
shoreline hardening (Natural System Modifications :: Other Ecosystem Modifications ) |
|
|
Commercial and Industrial Development (Residential & Commercial Development :: Commercial & Industrial Areas ) |
|
|
dams/reservoirs (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
Navigation (recreation and commercial) (Human Intrusions & Disturbance :: Recreational Activities ) |
|
|
surface water withdrawal (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
Commercial and Recreational Fishing (Biological Resource Use :: Fishing & Harvesting Aquatic Resources ) |
|
|
Utility Lines (Transportation & Service Corridors :: Utility & Service Lines ) |
|
|
Recreational Activities (boats, camping) (Human Intrusions & Disturbance :: Recreational Activities ) |
|
|
disease (Invasive & Other Problematic Species & Genes :: Problematic Native Species ) |
|
|
point source discharge (Pollution :: Garbage & Solid Waste ) |
|
|
Roads & Railroads (Transportation & Service Corridors :: Roads & Railroads ) |
|
|
Agricultural practices (Agriculture & Aquaculture :: Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops ) |
|
|
dams and reservoirs (creation, operations, management) (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
docks (Natural System Modifications :: Other Ecosystem Modifications ) |
|
|
Eutrophication (Pollution :: Agricultural & Forestry Effluents ) |
|
|
groundwater withdrawal and surface water withdrawal (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
incompatible agricultural practices/golf courses/deadhead logging (Natural System Modifications :: Other Ecosystem Modifications ) |
|
|
Incompatible Fishing Practices (historic) (Biological Resource Use :: Fishing & Harvesting Aquatic Resources ) |
|
|
Incompatible Recreation Activities (Human Intrusions & Disturbance :: Recreational Activities ) |
|
|
New dam/reservoir construction (Natural System Modifications :: Dams & Water Management/Use ) |
|
|
Predation (Invasive & Other Problematic Species & Genes :: Problematic Native Species ) |
|
|
shoreline modification (Natural System Modifications :: Other Ecosystem Modifications ) |
|
* For information on the common taxonomy of threats, see http://conservationmeasures.org/CMP/IUCN/.
| Strategy (Common Taxonomy) | Threats Addressed |
|---|---|
|
Assist with the development of a GA Invasive Species Abatement Plan; participate in state and regional invasive species partnerships.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
By 2011, influence Liberty, McIntosh and Bryan Counties to develop and implement conservation ordinances (including zoning such as Core Conservation Areas and Low Impact Development) in their comprehensive plans.
( Law & Policy :: Policies & Regulations ) |
|
|
Categorize boat activity within the project area and identify areas of concern relating to conservation targets (e.g. marsh erosion areas with high boat traffic).
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Communicate the importance of invasive species control and effectiveness of abatement methods, including conducting a workshop on a biannual basis and sharing lessons through a central clearing house and invasive networks.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Complete geomorphological analysis of the Altamaha River watershed.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Conduct a literature review to evaluate the impact of dredging activities on conservation targets.
( Species Management :: Species Management ) |
|
|
Consider the ecosystem values of the areas being impacted in siting decisions.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Create education campaigns that build understanding of the relationship between boating activities and priority species and habitats.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Determine and implement appropriate acquisition, easement, management, monitoring, research and regulatory actions to preclude and limit development in priority areas.
( Land/Water Protection :: Resource & Habitat Protection ) |
|
|
Determine fire management needs for priority targets and sites that are fire dependent; prioritize sites for implementation of increased fire management.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Develop and implement a monitoring program for restoration projects, including comparison with reference sites.
( Land/Water Management :: Habitat & Natural Process Restoration ) |
|
|
Develop and implement a pilot project and process to evaluate techniques for alternative/natural shoreline control.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Develop and implement a process and criteria (including sea level rise) to prioritize wetlands for restoration within the project area, taking into consideration opportunities to work at the ecosystem scale.
( Land/Water Management :: Habitat & Natural Process Restoration ) |
|
|
Develop and implement monitoring methods for use a LID sites focusing on water quality, habitat conservation and effectiveness of restoration. Use reference sites for comparison. Incorporate methods as part of pilot project.
( Species Management :: Species Recovery ) |
|
|
Develop and refine oyster restoration materials (including shell recycling) and techniques for the intertidal zone.
( Species Management :: Species Recovery ) |
|
|
Develop and support the use of incentives to maintain lands in forest management (e.g. tax incentives, transfer of development rights).
( Livelihood, Economic & Other Incentives :: Conservation Payments ) |
|
|
Develop geospatial models to identify wetland mitigation corridors and future shore zones.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Ensure that critical areas are identified and marked and that current regulations are adequate and effectively enforced.
( Law & Policy :: Compliance & Enforcement ) |
|
|
Establish a coastal fire management collaborative.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Establish an early detection response team.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Establish one functional tidal freshwater forest wetland restoration site considering hydrology, vegetation, and species composition.
( Land/Water Management :: Habitat & Natural Process Restoration ) |
|
|
Evaluate and implement management techniques that will ensure resilient oyster reefs (e.g. conservation leasing, creation of sanctuaries, fishing and permit regulations).
( Species Management :: Species Management ) |
|
|
Evaluate and map extent of current shoreline hardening.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Evaluate current level of prescribed fire for coastal conservation areas.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Identify and map priority invasive species within the project area.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Identify and map priority sites for oyster restoration and conservation using current and historic distribution, land use and ownership, key threats, and site selection criteria.
( Species Management :: Species Recovery ) |
|
|
Identify and prioritize conservation lands and water to protect targets through a collaborative mapping and inventory project.
( Land/Water Protection :: Resource & Habitat Protection ) |
|
|
Identify and protect upland areas in order to limit negative impacts (e.g. sedimentation, pollution) on oyster populations (implementation linked to development related objectives).
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Identify and secure partners and funding for wetland restoration.
( External Capacity Building :: Conservation Finance ) |
|
|
Identify and secure partners and funding that will enable corrent restoration programs to work at an ecosystem scale.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Identify innovative funding sources and develop ecosystem services markets (e.g. carbon, storm buffers, traditional land and water uses).
( External Capacity Building :: Conservation Finance ) |
|
|
Identify partner, roles and funding for fire management.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Identify partners (public and private) to develop and enhance "green" certifications and incentives.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Incorporate principles, objectives and actions into the Coastal Comprehensive Plan (CCP) that will result in conservation of priority targets, areas and threat abatement.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Increase education efforts.
( Education & Awareness :: Formal Education ) |
|
|
Map and evaluate watershed land use
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Map corridors and blockages to connectivity (e.g. dams, roads) within the watershed.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Map current oyster reef locations along the entire Georgia coast in order to support oyster conservation and restoration at an ecosystem scale.
( Species Management :: Species Recovery ) |
|
|
Minimize land conversion within the watershed, especially in those areas that have a high impact on downstream conditions.
( Land/Water Protection :: Resource & Habitat Protection ) |
|
|
Model shoreline to determine feasibility of using shoreline control methods.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Modify permitting process to decrease the length of time required to secure permits for restoration activities.
( Land/Water Management :: Habitat & Natural Process Restoration ) |
|
|
Modify state and local shoreline management policies and permits to enable and promotee alternative/natural shoreline control.
( Law & Policy :: Policies & Regulations ) |
|
|
Monitor estuarine water quality
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Monitor water quality parameters along the entire Georgia coast in order to classify areas for oyster harvest.
( Species Management :: Species Management ) |
|
|
Participate in Southern Region and Global Marine Team oyster restoration meetings and networks.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Participate in state, regional and federal programs related to carbon emissions and sequestrations.
( External Capacity Building :: Institutional & Civil Society Development ) |
|
|
Participate in the GA DNR invasive species state management plan team.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Plan, implement and monitor invasive species abatement at selected sites, including development of partnerships and identification of funding.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Provide fire management assistance to priority sites.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Provide outreach to build support for and promote conservation planning and zoning, acquisition of easements/land, and alternative/low-impact development practices.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Quantify dredging activities (current and proposed) within the project area.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Regionally, participate with the Southeast Aquatics Resources Partnership in developing thier Aquatice Nuisance Species Network and Plan.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Revew current regulations and permit guidelines to identify opportunities to reduce the impact of dredging on conservation targets, including increased opportunities for mitigation.
( Law & Policy :: Policies & Regulations ) |
|
|
Support the use of best management practices on agricultural and forest lands within the watershed.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Support, through the Global Invasive Species Network, passage of comprehensive aquatic invasive sp. legislation to close major pathways of invaders to the U.S.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Use geospatial models to identify priority communities.
( Land/Water Management :: Site/Area Management ) |
|
|
Use model results to help prioritize protection decisions (e.g. acquisitions, easements and land use planning).
( Land/Water Protection :: Resource & Habitat Protection ) |
|
|
Use models and other information to increase understanding of climate change and sea level rise among local governments, landowners and other interested parties.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Work to proactively identify habitat restoration and mitigation opportunities prior to and after storm events (link to restoration strategies).
( Land/Water Management :: Habitat & Natural Process Restoration ) |
|
|
Work with experts and partners to develop a coastal conservation easement template.
( Land/Water Protection :: Resource & Habitat Protection ) |
|
|
Work with landowners and contractors to promote alternative/natural shoreline control options.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Work with landowners, developers, and contractors to promote alternative development options.
( Education & Awareness :: Awareness & Communications ) |
|
|
Work with partners to develop and implement a "green" pilot project by 2009. The site, landowners, and partners should be identified by 2008. Pilot should include mechanisms to evaluate LID techniques.
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
|
Work with partners to have GA adopt invasive-potential screening process for ornamental plants and ballast water.
( Land/Water Management :: Invasive/Problematic Species Control ) |
|
|
Work with state agencies to revise and/or current policies (e.g. no wake zones) in order to conserve targets.
( Law & Policy :: Policies & Regulations ) |
|
|
Work with the CCP Advisory Council and partners to secure the adoption and funding of the CCP.
( External Capacity Building :: Conservation Finance ) |
|
|
Work with the Global Marine Team and other partners to take an ecosystem-based management approach linking coastal hazards planning and biodiversity conservation (Gulf of Mexico example).
( External Capacity Building :: Alliance & Partnership Development ) |
|
| Conservation Targets | Landscape Context | Condition | Size | Viability Rank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | Weight | Grade | Weight | Grade | Weight | |||
| 1 | Tidal Freshwater Forest | - | 1.0 | Fair | 1.0 | Fair | 1.0 | Fair |
| 2 | Tidal Freshwater Marsh | Fair | 1.0 | - | 1.0 | - | 1.0 | Fair |
| 3 | Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh | Good | 1.0 | Good | 1.0 | Good | 1.0 | Good |
| 4 | Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) | Good | 1.0 | Good | 1.0 | - | 1.0 | Good |
| 5 | Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities | Good | 1.0 | Poor | 1.0 | Good | 1.0 | Fair |
| 6 | Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands | - | 1.0 | - | 1.0 | - | 1.0 | - |
| 7 | Sandy Beach Ecosystems | Very Good | 1.0 | Good | 1.0 | Very Good | 1.0 | Very Good |
| Project Biodiversity Health Rank | Good | |||||||
You might have to scroll to see all of the table's data.
|
Project-specific Threats (Common Taxonomy *) |
Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities | Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands | Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh | Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) | Sandy Beach Ecosystems | Tidal Freshwater Forest | Tidal Freshwater Marsh | Overall Threat Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Housing & Urban Development (Housing & Urban Areas) |
High | Very High | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
| Invasive Species/Predation (Invasive Non-Native/Alien Species) |
Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | High |
| Climate Change - Habitat Shifting and Alteration (Habitat Shifting & Alteration) |
Medium | Low | Medium | - | Medium | High | High | High |
| Forestry Practices (Logging & Wood Harvesting) |
Medium | High | - | Medium | - | High | Medium | High |
| groundwater withdrawal (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
Low | Medium | Medium | Medium | - | Medium | High | Medium |
| ditches/drains (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
- | - | Medium | Medium | - | High | Medium | Medium |
| dredging (Shipping Lanes) |
Medium | - | High | Medium | Medium | - | - | Medium |
| shoreline hardening (Other Ecosystem Modifications) |
- | - | High | - | Medium | - | Low | Medium |
| Commercial and Industrial Development (Commercial & Industrial Areas) |
- | - | High | Medium | - | - | - | Medium |
| dams/reservoirs (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
Medium | - | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
| Navigation (recreation and commercial) (Recreational Activities) |
High | - | - | - | - | - | - | Medium |
| surface water withdrawal (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
Medium | - | Medium | Medium | - | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Commercial and Recreational Fishing (Fishing & Harvesting Aquatic Resources) |
Medium | - | - | Medium | - | - | - | Medium |
| Utility Lines (Utility & Service Lines) |
- | Medium | - | - | - | Medium | - | Medium |
| Recreational Activities (boats, camping) (Recreational Activities) |
- | - | Low | - | Medium | - | Low | Low |
| disease (Problematic Native Species) |
Medium | - | - | - | - | - | - | Low |
| point source discharge (Garbage & Solid Waste) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | Medium | Low |
| Roads & Railroads (Roads & Railroads) |
- | - | - | - | - | Medium | - | Low |
| Agricultural practices (Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | Low | Low |
| dams and reservoirs (creation, operations, management) (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| docks (Other Ecosystem Modifications) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eutrophication (Agricultural & Forestry Effluents) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| groundwater withdrawal and surface water withdrawal (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| incompatible agricultural practices/golf courses/deadhead logging (Other Ecosystem Modifications) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Incompatible Fishing Practices (historic) (Fishing & Harvesting Aquatic Resources) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Incompatible Recreation Activities (Recreational Activities) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New dam/reservoir construction (Dams & Water Management/Use) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Predation (Problematic Native Species) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| shoreline modification (Other Ecosystem Modifications) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Threat Status for Targets and Project | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | Very High |
| Categories & Measures | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| People | ||
| Staff Leadership | - | |
| Multidisciplinary Team | - | |
| People Average | - | |
Internal Resources |
||
| Institutional Learning | - | |
| Funding | - | |
| Internal Resources Average | - | |
External Resources |
||
| Social/Legal Framework for Conservation | - | |
| Community and Constituency Support | - | |
| External Resources Average | - | |
| Overall Project Resource Rank | ||
| Conservation Target | Key Attribute (Category) |
Indicator | Current Indicator Measurement | Rating Comments: (Poor, Fair Good Very Good) |
Current Rating and Date | Desired Rating and Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tidal Freshwater Forest |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
species composition | This indicator needs to be refined. It is not measureable as currently listed. |
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Fair
Jun 15, 2007 |
Good
Jun 15, 2007 |
| Tidal Freshwater Forest |
Hydrologic regime (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
1
(Condition) |
Change in flow (floods, high flow pulses, low flows, quantity) from natural conditions | Altered hydology includes historic forestry practices. (Do we have a percentage altered?) |
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Fair
2
Jun 15, 2007 |
Good
Jun 15, 2007 |
| Tidal Freshwater Forest |
Quantity of freshwater
(Condition) |
Salinity | Are we measuring salinity in the pore water? Can this be combined with hydrology? |
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Good
Jun 15, 2007 |
Good
Jun 15, 2007 |
| Tidal Freshwater Forest |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Degree of ecotone disturbance | The team was not able to determine the status of this indicator, it needs to be further defined |
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
3
Apr 15, 2008 |
-
|
| Tidal Freshwater Forest |
Extent
4
(Size) |
Proportion and location of current extent vs. historic | Do we have this data, are areas mapped regularly? |
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Fair
5
Jun 15, 2007 |
Good
Jun 15, 2007 |
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Community structure and composition
(Condition) |
Proportion and location of current extent vs. historic |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Hydrologic regime (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
(Condition) |
Change in flow (floods, high flow pulses, low flows, quantity) from natural conditions |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Hydrologic regime (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
(Condition) |
Change in delivery of freshwater through system from natural conditions |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Contaminants |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Dissolved oxygen |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
Good
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Nutrients |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
Good
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Salinity |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
Good
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Water Temperature |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
Good
|
| Tidal Freshwater Marsh |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Degree of ecotone disturbance | How to measure? |
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Fair
Jun 15, 2007 |
Good
Jun 15, 2007 |
| Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
Representative species composition 6 |
-
|
Poor:
Emergent intertidal marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora however healthy, non-chloratic variants of S. alterniflora are rare. Plant densities and sizes are evident of stressor effects Co-dominant vegetation communities are either over or under rep
Fair: Emergent intertidal marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora with healthy, non-chloratic variants of S. alterniflora present ie. large, robust individuals present at creek edges with short growth forms present at high marsh area. Co-dominant vegetation c Good: Emergent intertidal marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora with healthy, non-chloratic variants of S. alterniflora present ie. large, robust individuals present at creek edges with short growth forms present at high marsh area. However, also intersper Very Good: Emergent intertidal marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora with healthy, non-chloratic variants of S. alterniflora present ie. large, robust individuals present at creek edges with short growth forms present at high marsh area. However, also interspers |
Good
|
Very Good
|
| Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh |
Hydrologic regime (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
(Condition) |
Pore water salinity and surface water flow 7 |
-
|
Poor:
Hydroperiod has been highly altered. Marsh is subjected to near-complete diurnal tidal prism only on spring tides or as driven by stochastic events . Large, frequent(with storm events) swinging fluctuations in surface water salinities.
Fair: Hydroperiod has been altered but not dramatically. Marsh is subjected to a near-complete diurnal tidal prism with two daily minima and maxima however marsh seems much more subject to fluctuations in surface water salinity variation caused by upland mani Good: Hydroperiod is natural and unaffected ie. Marsh is subjected to a complete diurnal tidal prism (east coast application) with two daily minima and maxima. (water delivery and water quantity). Very Good: Hydroperiod is natural and unaffected ie. Marsh is subjected to a complete diurnal tidal prism (east coast application) with two daily minima and maxima. (water delivery and water quantity). |
Good
Jun 15, 2006 |
Good
Jun 15, 2016 |
| Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh |
Sediment regime
(Condition) |
Rate of accretion and loss |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Good
|
Good
8
|
| Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Extent of shoreline hardening, filling, clearing 9 |
-
|
Poor:
Evidence of human manipulation exists within the targeted or defined marsh area greatly affecting the quality of one of the following components: hydrology uplands, vegetation communities
Fair: Evidence of human manipulation exists within the targeted or defined marsh area slightly affecting the quality of one of the following components: hydrology uplands, vegetation communities. Good: •No evidence of human manipulations within the targeted or defined marsh area affecting the hydrology (ditching/diking, dredging), uplands (development, septic system,) or vegetation communities (filling, armoring) within the salt marsh zone. Very Good: No evidence of human manipulations within the targeted or defined marsh area affecting the hydrology (ditching/diking, redging),uplands (development, septic system,) or vegetation communities (filling, armoring) within the salt marsh zone. |
Good
|
Good
|
| Regularly Flooded Salt Marsh |
Vegetative cover (spatial or aerial variation)
(Size) |
% cover of salt marsh, brackish, bare 10 |
-
|
Poor:
Structural Patch Richness (Heterogeneity in habitat and landform) Structural patch richness is reduced (less than 3 different types of structural types (as defined by the California and Mid Atlantic Rapid Assessment Methods) exist within the marsh)
Fair: Structural Patch Richness (Heterogeneity in habitat and landform) Structural patch richness is reduced (less than 6 but greater than 3 different types of structural types (as defined by the California and Mid Atlantic Rapid Assessment Methods) exist with Good: Structural patch richness (Heterogeneity in habitat and landform) Structural patch richness is robust (greater than 6 different types of structural types (as defined by the California and Mid Atlantic Rapid Assessment Methods) exist within the marsh.) Very Good: Structural patch richness (Heterogeneity in habitat and landform) Structural patch richness is robust (greater than 8 different types of structural types (as defined by the California and Mid Atlantic Rapid Assessment Methods) exist within the marsh). |
Good
|
Very Good
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
Secondary productivity (fish and inverts) |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
striped bass 11 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
Presence/absence of key faunal species 12 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Hydrologic regime (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
(Condition) |
Change in flow (floods, high flow pulses, low flows, quantity) from natural conditions |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Stream morphology
(Condition) |
sediment movement/stability |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Stream morphology
(Condition) |
sinuosity |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Stream morphology
(Condition) |
Connectivity 13 |
-
|
Poor:
Stream buffer and passageway restoration is needed
Fair: Stream buffers and water passageways less than adequate for migration and widening of creeks Good: Natural stream buffers and water passageways are adequate for migration and widening of creeks with little intervention. Very Good: - |
Good
Aug 15, 2009 |
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Contaminants |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Dissolved oxygen |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Good
|
Good
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Nutrients |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
Salinity 14 |
-
|
Poor:
Salt wedge intrudes >> than X km upriver during >> X days per year
Fair: Salt wedge intrudes > than X km upriver during > X days per year Good: Salt wedge at current (2009) location/timing Very Good: - |
Good
Aug 15, 2009 |
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
temperature |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Water Quality
(Condition) |
turbidity 15 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Rivers, Tributaries, Tidal Creeks, and Sounds (Open Water and Bottom Habitat) |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Degree of ecotone disturbance 16 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Good
|
Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
% native vs. invasive resident species 17 |
-
|
Poor:
Reef dominated by non-viable oyster cultch that demonstrate low white calcification processes in January- March; High diiversity and high numbers of invasives present (for example green porcelain crabs are present in densities exceed 1000/m2 and are acco
Fair: Low diversity but a moderate numbers of invasives present (for example possibly only green porcelain crabs are present but densities exceed 300/m2 ); Moderate to low seasonal diversity of finfish present in water column associated with reef. Good: Reef dominated by viable living oysters that demonstrate large white calcification processes in January- March; Low numbers of invasive bivalve species (charra mnusel, green mussel, green porcelain crab); High seasonal diversity of finfish present in wat Very Good: Reef dominated by viable living oysters that demonstrate large white calcification processes in January- March; No invasive benthic decapods (European green crab, green porcelain crab) or bivalves (green mussels or charra mussles) present; High seasonal |
Good
|
Very Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Hydrologic regime - (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
(Condition) |
Salinity 18 |
-
|
Poor:
Frequently fluctuates outside of 5-30ppt
Fair: Infrequently falls outside of 6-30 ppt Good: Does not fall outside of 10-30 ppt Very Good: Does not fall outside of 10-28 ppt. |
Fair
19
|
Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Population structure
(Condition) |
age class distribution of oysters |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Poor
20
|
Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Recruitment
(Condition) |
Fecundity and survival rate 21 |
-
|
Poor:
Low recruitment (<500 spat /m2 /year) with high numbers of barnacle attachment (> 30 barnacles/mature oyster) relative to YOY oyster spat
Fair: Moderate recruitment (500 - 1000 spat /m2 /year) with moderate numbers of barnacle attachment (> 10 barnacles/mature oyster) relative to YOY oyster spat Good: High recruitment (recruitment 1000 - 2000 spat /m2 /year) with low numbers of barnacle attachment relative to YOY oyster spat Very Good: High recruitment (> 2000 spat /m2 /year) with low numbers of barnacle attachment relative to YOY oyster spat |
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Species/community health
(Condition) |
Intensity and prevalence of disease and parasites |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Poor
22
|
Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Degree of ecotone disturbance |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Good
|
Good
|
| Intertidal Oyster Reef Communities |
Size / extent of characteristic communities / ecosystems
(Size) |
% historic sites with live shellfish |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Good
23
|
Good
|
| Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
Presence/absence of key faunal species 24 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
25
(Condition) |
% cover invasive tree species |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Degree of ecotone disturbance 26 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands |
Landscape pattern/configuration of forest communitites
27
(Landscape Context) |
patch size |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands |
Successional dynamics
28
(Landscape Context) |
Forest type heterogeneity |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Maritime Forest and Associated Wetlands |
Size/extent of characteristic communities or seral stages
(Size) |
number of acres in community types |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Sandy Beach Ecosystems |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
Density and distribution of key species |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Sandy Beach Ecosystems |
Characteristic floral and faunal communities
(Condition) |
Presence of invasive/exotic species |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Sandy Beach Ecosystems |
Hydrologic regime (timing, duration, frequency, extent)
(Condition) |
Freshwater sheet flow |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
-
|
-
|
| Sandy Beach Ecosystems |
Sediment regime
(Condition) |
Rate of accretion and loss |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: Loss greater than or equal to accretion Good: Accretion greater than or equal to loss Very Good: - |
Good
Aug 15, 2009 |
-
|
| Sandy Beach Ecosystems |
Connectivity among communities and ecosystems
(Landscape Context) |
Extent of shoreline hardening, filling, clearing 29 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: X% -Y% of shoreline armored Good: 0 - X% of shoreline armored Very Good: 0% of shoreline armored |
Very Good
Aug 15, 2009 |
Very Good
|
| Sandy Beach Ecosystems |
Size / extent of characteristic communities / ecosystems
(Size) |
Disturbance 30 |
-
|
Poor:
-
Fair: - Good: - Very Good: - |
Very Good
Aug 15, 2009 |
-
|
COMMENTS:
1
Tidal freshwater forests and associated species are dependent on natural flooding and water flow conditions. Alterations can chance the flora species composition and limit access to the area by associated fauna.
2
Historic forestry practices have altered tidal freshwater forest habitats in the project area through ditching and dikes. Flow in the mainstem Altamaha is in good condition due to a lake of dams below the fall line.
4
Tidal freshwater forest is an important ecosystem with limited are that meet conditions necessary to exist. There is a need to maintain or increase the amount of this ecosystem within the project site.
8
This requires a longer than 10 year focus due to the scales at which sea level rises. Strategies that we apply now must be focused further out than 10 years.
11
This needs to be clarified - is it striped bass presence, a seasonality, age structure, key habitat?
12
Need to define key species. Would it make sense to make striped bass on such species or should we keep it as a separate indicator?
13
Indicator ratings per Christi Lambert - August 2009
In this case are we tallking about connectivity moving upstream or landward? Does this really fall under morphology or under the connectivity KEA?
17
Dorset Hurley, personal communication in preparation for Climate Change Adaptation Clinic September 2009
18
Dorset Hurley, personal communication, in preparation for Climate Change Adaptation Clinic, September 2009
19
If you take into account atlamaha and ogeechee sounds - is poor (rice fields)
If you look at it across the other sounds, things look good (St. Catherines, Sapelo, etc.) so even out to fair
Confidence of the current rating: High
20
2 years old is about the mav age seen in GA (possible age of 10). Due to Perkensis sp. disease. ASk Victor Thompson (to look at oster reefs in shell rings and acheological sites)
Confidence of the current rating: High
21
Dorset Hurley, Personal Communication in prep for Climate Change Adaptation Clinic September 2009
22
in other areas, the disease wipes things out very quickly. We may have more durable oysters here in GA.
Confidence of the current rating: High
23
Not only are their dead reefs, but we are missing the huge moungs (4-5 feet high)
Confidence of the current rating: High
25
Alteration of flow is causing a decreasing in the frequency and extent of flooding within the floodplain. As areas become less wet and for shorter lengths of time, upland species of trees (less tolarant to flooding) will become the dominant species/comunity type.
26
Across the board this needs to be defined. For some reason I thought we had done this - am I imagining?
27
Is this the right title? How does it relate to the size/extent and connectivity KEAs for maritime forest? I think there is some redundancy here.
- Show all:
Objective: (1.1) By 2015, protect, through permanent conservation status, XX acres (or X%) of priority habitat (areas including or adjacent to conservation targets) through acquisitions, easements and planning.
-
Strategic Action: Identify and prioritize conservation lands and water to protect targets through a collaborative mapping and inventory project.
-
Strategic Action: Determine and implement appropriate acquisition, easement, management, monitoring, research and regulatory actions to preclude and limit development in priority areas.
-
Strategic Action: Work with experts and partners to develop a coastal conservation easement template.
Objective: (1.2) By 2010, work with regional, state and local partners to create or modify a min of 3 management plans (e.g. comp. plans, zoning ordinances, land-use regs.) to effectively minimize the impact of development on targets. (coastal dev.)
(comments)
Comment:
Work with the CCP is underway and scheduled to be completed in 2008 and 2009.
-
Strategic Action: Incorporate principles, objectives and actions into the Coastal Comprehensive Plan (CCP) that will result in conservation of priority targets, areas and threat abatement.
-
Strategic Action: Work with the CCP Advisory Council and partners to secure the adoption and funding of the CCP.
-
Strategic Action: By 2011, influence Liberty, McIntosh and Bryan Counties to develop and implement conservation ordinances (including zoning such as Core Conservation Areas and Low Impact Development) in their comprehensive plans.
-
Strategic Action: Provide outreach to build support for and promote conservation planning and zoning, acquisition of easements/land, and alternative/low-impact development practices.
Objective: (1.3) By 2012, work with partners to implement low impact development at a min. of 2 residential developments that are within or adjacent to priority conservation sites.
-
Strategic Action: Identify partners (public and private) to develop and enhance "green" certifications and incentives.
-
Strategic Action: Work with landowners, developers, and contractors to promote alternative development options.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and implement monitoring methods for use a LID sites focusing on water quality, habitat conservation and effectiveness of restoration. Use reference sites for comparison. Incorporate methods as part of pilot project.
-
Strategic Action: Work with partners to develop and implement a "green" pilot project by 2009. The site, landowners, and partners should be identified by 2008. Pilot should include mechanisms to evaluate LID techniques.
Objective: (1.4) By 2015, ensure that all shore erosion control projects consider "soft" or hybrid mitigation options and that at least 80% of new projects, in areas where alternative methods are feasible, use ecologically sensitive techniques.
(comments)
Comment:
CRD has begun working to to map GA's shoreline. Funding has been received through NOAA/TNC CRP to conduct a pilot project on SI NERR.
-
Strategic Action: Evaluate and map extent of current shoreline hardening.
-
Strategic Action: Model shoreline to determine feasibility of using shoreline control methods.
(measures info)
Progress Updated Comments Planned - - -
Strategic Action: Modify state and local shoreline management policies and permits to enable and promotee alternative/natural shoreline control.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and implement a pilot project and process to evaluate techniques for alternative/natural shoreline control.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and implement a monitoring program for restoration projects, including comparison with reference sites.
-
Strategic Action: Work with landowners and contractors to promote alternative/natural shoreline control options.
Objective: (1.5) By 2015, ensure that new marinas are located in areas that limit impact on targets, include mitigation req's focused on ecological priorities, use low impact construction and maintenance techniques and encourage public access.
-
Strategic Action: Consider the ecosystem values of the areas being impacted in siting decisions.
Objective: (1.6) By 2012, work with regional, state and local partners to effectively minimize the impact of docks and piers on conservation targets.
Objective: (1.7) By 2015, enhance dredge permitting guidelines (large and small scale) to minimize the impacts of disposal, scouring, sediment, and pollutant activation and habitat loss.
-
Strategic Action: Conduct a literature review to evaluate the impact of dredging activities on conservation targets.
-
Strategic Action: Quantify dredging activities (current and proposed) within the project area.
-
Strategic Action: Revew current regulations and permit guidelines to identify opportunities to reduce the impact of dredging on conservation targets, including increased opportunities for mitigation.
Objective: (2.1) By 2012, implement effective management techniques to minimize (0%) loss of current intertidal oyster population.
(comments)
Comment:
Oyster conservation and restoration efforts are expected to be led by UGA-MAREX and DNR-CRD. TNC will have a supporting role.
-
Strategic Action: Map current oyster reef locations along the entire Georgia coast in order to support oyster conservation and restoration at an ecosystem scale.
-
Strategic Action: Monitor water quality parameters along the entire Georgia coast in order to classify areas for oyster harvest.
-
Strategic Action: Identify and protect upland areas in order to limit negative impacts (e.g. sedimentation, pollution) on oyster populations (implementation linked to development related objectives).
-
Strategic Action: Evaluate and implement management techniques that will ensure resilient oyster reefs (e.g. conservation leasing, creation of sanctuaries, fishing and permit regulations).
Objective: (2.2) By 2015, based on historic and current distributions, restore XX% of historic oyster reef habitat within the project area.
-
Strategic Action: Identify and map priority sites for oyster restoration and conservation using current and historic distribution, land use and ownership, key threats, and site selection criteria.
-
Strategic Action: Modify permitting process to decrease the length of time required to secure permits for restoration activities.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and refine oyster restoration materials (including shell recycling) and techniques for the intertidal zone.
-
Strategic Action: Identify and secure partners and funding that will enable corrent restoration programs to work at an ecosystem scale.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and implement a monitoring program for restoration projects, including comparison with reference sites.
-
Strategic Action: Participate in Southern Region and Global Marine Team oyster restoration meetings and networks.
Objective: (2.3) By 2015, restore XX acres of tidal wetlands (including salt marsh, tidal fw marsh, and tidal fw forest) in the project area.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and implement a process and criteria (including sea level rise) to prioritize wetlands for restoration within the project area, taking into consideration opportunities to work at the ecosystem scale.
-
Strategic Action: Identify and secure partners and funding for wetland restoration.
-
Strategic Action: Establish one functional tidal freshwater forest wetland restoration site considering hydrology, vegetation, and species composition.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and implement a monitoring program for restoration projects, including comparison with reference sites.
Objective: (2.4) By 2012, coordinate with the Southern Region Prescribed Fire Network to develop and implement guidelines and strategies for prescribed fire in coastal and tidal marshes and forests.
-
Strategic Action: Evaluate current level of prescribed fire for coastal conservation areas.
-
Strategic Action: Determine fire management needs for priority targets and sites that are fire dependent; prioritize sites for implementation of increased fire management.
-
Strategic Action: Identify partner, roles and funding for fire management.
-
Strategic Action: Establish a coastal fire management collaborative.
-
Strategic Action: Provide fire management assistance to priority sites.
Objective: (3.1) By 2015, develop and implement management plans to reduce existing populations of three priority invasive species (e.g. Phragmites, Chinese Tallow, Water Hyancinth).
-
Strategic Action: Identify and map priority invasive species within the project area.
-
Strategic Action: Plan, implement and monitor invasive species abatement at selected sites, including development of partnerships and identification of funding.
-
Strategic Action: Communicate the importance of invasive species control and effectiveness of abatement methods, including conducting a workshop on a biannual basis and sharing lessons through a central clearing house and invasive networks.
-
Strategic Action: Assist with the development of a GA Invasive Species Abatement Plan; participate in state and regional invasive species partnerships.
-
Strategic Action: Establish an early detection response team.
Objective: (3.2) By 2012, work to ensure that invasive species that have high potential to threaten biodiversity and impact project conservation targets are restricted or prohibited in Georgia.
(comments)
Comment:
TNC will take a leadership role. Other partners include DNR-WRD, SI NERR, UGA-MAREX, USFWS
-
Strategic Action: Support, through the Global Invasive Species Network, passage of comprehensive aquatic invasive sp. legislation to close major pathways of invaders to the U.S.
-
Strategic Action: Regionally, participate with the Southeast Aquatics Resources Partnership in developing thier Aquatice Nuisance Species Network and Plan.
-
Strategic Action: Work with partners to have GA adopt invasive-potential screening process for ornamental plants and ballast water.
-
Strategic Action: Participate in the GA DNR invasive species state management plan team.
Objective: (4.1) Within the next 25 years, effectively conserve 80 percent of the sites that are expected to increase in conservation value due to sea-level rise and climate change during the next 50-100 years.
-
Strategic Action: Develop geospatial models to identify wetland mitigation corridors and future shore zones.
-
Strategic Action: Use model results to help prioritize protection decisions (e.g. acquisitions, easements and land use planning).
-
Strategic Action: Use models and other information to increase understanding of climate change and sea level rise among local governments, landowners and other interested parties.
Objective: (4.2) By 2015, evaluate and implement opportunities to incorporate conservation activities (e.g. land protection, management, and restoration) as part of larger state, regional and national carbon stop loss and sequestration strategies.
-
Strategic Action: Participate in state, regional and federal programs related to carbon emissions and sequestrations.
Objective: (4.3) By 2012, work with X (#) of state/local communities and agencies to develop and/or revise coastal hazard response plans designed to mitigate the impact of storm events, flooding, inundation and sea level rise in relation to conservation targets.
-
Strategic Action: Use geospatial models to identify priority communities.
-
Strategic Action: Work with the Global Marine Team and other partners to take an ecosystem-based management approach linking coastal hazards planning and biodiversity conservation (Gulf of Mexico example).
-
Strategic Action: Work to proactively identify habitat restoration and mitigation opportunities prior to and after storm events (link to restoration strategies).
Objective: (5.1) By 2015, ensure that water management plans (e.g. surface and groundwater withdrawals, and dams) meet needs of the conservation targets
Objective: (5.2) Ensure that the coastal waters in the project maintain water quality standards (e.g. nitrogen, dissolved oxygen) necessary to conserve the areas ecological resources.
-
Strategic Action: Map and evaluate watershed land use
-
Strategic Action: Monitor estuarine water quality
-
Strategic Action: Minimize land conversion within the watershed, especially in those areas that have a high impact on downstream conditions.
-
Strategic Action: Support the use of best management practices on agricultural and forest lands within the watershed.
-
Strategic Action: Develop and support the use of incentives to maintain lands in forest management (e.g. tax incentives, transfer of development rights).
-
Strategic Action: Identify innovative funding sources and develop ecosystem services markets (e.g. carbon, storm buffers, traditional land and water uses).
Objective: (5.3) Ensure that the sediment regime within the Altamaha and Ogeechee watersheds is maintained in a way to support downstream conservation targets.
-
Strategic Action: Complete geomorphological analysis of the Altamaha River watershed.
Objective: (5.4) Work to ensure watershed connectivity for species (e.g. diadromous fish, migratory birds) and materials (e.g. sediments).
-
Strategic Action: Map corridors and blockages to connectivity (e.g. dams, roads) within the watershed.
Objective: (6.1) By 2010, promote and enforce regulations on recreational activities that minimize adverse impacts to priority species and communities (e.g. sea turtles, shorebirds) that use barrier island and beach habitat.
(comments)
Comment:
DNR-WRD and USFWS would be the leads for this objectives. Not a high priority for TNC. Identify sites using maps
-
Strategic Action: Ensure that critical areas are identified and marked and that current regulations are adequate and effectively enforced.
-
Strategic Action: Increase education efforts.
Objective: (6.2) By 2015, ensure that water management plans meet the needs of estuarine targets. Water management plans include surface and groundwater withdrawal and dams.
Objective: (6.2) By 2015, minimize the impact of boating activities on conservation targets and priority species.
-
Strategic Action: Categorize boat activity within the project area and identify areas of concern relating to conservation targets (e.g. marsh erosion areas with high boat traffic).
-
Strategic Action: Work with state agencies to revise and/or current policies (e.g. no wake zones) in order to conserve targets.
-
Strategic Action: Create education campaigns that build understanding of the relationship between boating activities and priority species and habitats.
- Show all:
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Comment: Work with the CCP is underway and scheduled to be completed in 2008 and 2009.
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Comment: CRD has begun working to to map GA's shoreline. Funding has been received through NOAA/TNC CRP to conduct a pilot project on SI NERR.
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Comment: Oyster conservation and restoration efforts are expected to be led by UGA-MAREX and DNR-CRD. TNC will have a supporting role.
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Comment: TNC will take a leadership role. Other partners include DNR-WRD, SI NERR, UGA-MAREX, USFWS
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Comment: DNR-WRD and USFWS would be the leads for this objectives. Not a high priority for TNC. Identify sites using maps
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
Percent Complete: 0%
![]() |
|
| Methods | Objectives | Key Indicator References by Target (w/Current Indicator Measurement) | Threat References by Target (w/Current Indicator Measurement) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Indicator: % cover invasive tree species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: % cover of salt marsh, brackish, bare |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: % historic sites with live shellfish |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: % native vs. invasive resident species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: % of native vs. invasive faunal species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: % of plants and animals |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Change in delivery of freshwater through system from natural conditions |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Change in flow (floods, high flow pulses, low flows, quantity) from natural conditions |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Connectivity |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Contaminants |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Degree of ecotone disturbance |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Density and distribution of key species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Dissolved oxygen |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Disturbance |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Extent of shoreline hardening, filling, clearing |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Fecundity and survival rate |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Foraging and nesting habitat for floodplain bird species (?) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Forest type heterogeneity |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Freshwater sheet flow |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Intensity and prevalence of disease and parasites |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Nitrogen (?) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Nutrients |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Percentage of native vs invasiv species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Pore water salinity and surface water flow |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Presence of invasive/exotic species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Presence/absence of key faunal species |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Proportion and location of current extent vs. historic |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Rate of accretion and loss |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Representative species composition |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: River Discharge |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Salinity |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Secondary productivity (fish and inverts) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Sturgeon, striped bass, crabs, shrimp, mantees |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Undefined Indicator |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: Water Temperature |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: age class distribution of oysters |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: extent of appropriate reef building habitat |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: facal coliform bacteria |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: number of acres in community types |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: patch size |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: sediment load - upland sediment deposition |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: sediment movement/stability |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: shoreline harboring |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: sinuosity |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: species composition |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: striped bass |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: temperature |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicator: turbidity |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
The CAP data pack, available for download using the download link below, has been modified. You will need to use CAP Excel Workbook version 6b
(or later) to import the CAP data pack. The data pack is an Excel 97/2003 formatted file with an extension of .xls. So, if you are using Excel 2007,
please remember to save all CAP files in the Excel 97-2003 Workbook format.
Help regarding this issue can be found in the CAP Workbook instructions and on ConserveOnline at:
http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/cbdgateway/cap/resources
- Download the latest CAP Excel Workbook.
- Download the ConPro Data Pack now!
Notes:
Help regarding this issue can be found in the CAP Workbook instructions and on ConserveOnline at:
http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/cbdgateway/cap/resources
- Download the latest CAP Excel Workbook.
- Download the ConPro Data Pack now!
Notes:
- It is always a good idea to use the latest CAP Excel workbook!
- You may see a "File Error: Data may have been lost" message when opening a Data Pack that was downloaded from ConPro. Please ignore this warning.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

